Writing Nonconformities: Root Cause Analysis to the Rescue

Discover why writing nonconformities without proper root cause analysis is a short-term fix that can lead to bigger issues during audits. Learn effective strategies to address nonconformities comprehensively.

Steven L.

10/22/20253 min read

Writing nonconformities without root cause analysis is like fixing a leaky pipe with duct tape — loo
Writing nonconformities without root cause analysis is like fixing a leaky pipe with duct tape — loo
đź§© Why Great Nonconformities Fall Flat Without Root Cause Analysis

If your nonconformities keep popping up like a game of whack-a-mole, you might not have a findings problem — you’ve got a root cause gap.

Writing ISO-compliant nonconformities is only half the battle. If you stop there — without real Root Cause Analysis (RCA) — you're leaving compliance gains on the table and letting issues linger like a bad sequel.

Let’s break down how RCA turns findings into fixes that stick.

🦇 A Perfect Nonconformity Without RCA Is Like Batman Without Robin

Sharp nonconformities are great. But without RCA, they’re only doing half the job.

You might:

  • Nail the clause reference

  • Attach the right evidence

  • Sound like a Quality Jedi

But if you don’t pair that with RCA? You’re skipping the part where the problem actually gets solved.

Root Cause Analysis is what turns your audit from fault-finding into system-fixing. It’s how you go from chasing issues… to preventing them.

💥 "Fix It" Isn’t Fixed Enough

Ever seen this movie?

  • Audit done

  • Nonconformity closed

  • Three months later… same finding shows up again

Clause 10.2.1(b) of ISO 9001:2015 doesn’t want you to patch problems — it wants you to eliminate them:

“Evaluate the need for action to eliminate the cause of the nonconformity in order that it does not recur.”

TL;DR: Don’t just slap a Band-Aid on it. Solve the plumbing problem.

🎯 Why Your Audit Findings Keep Coming Back

Nonconformities tell you what happened. RCA tells you why.

The most common RCA fail? Blaming people.

Bad RCA:
Root Cause: “Employee forgot.”
Action: “Retrain employee.”

That’s not analysis — that’s a shrug.

If “operator error” keeps showing up, it’s not an employee issue — it’s a system issue that allows human error to go unchecked.

đź§© Case Study: The Forklift Follies (Part 2)

Let’s head back to our fictional factory: Acme Components.

They followed the R.E.A.L. framework — Requirement, Evidence, Analysis, Link — and documented a textbook-perfect nonconformity.

❌ Expired calibration certs
📎 Evidence attached
📜 Clause 7.1.5 cited

But their RCA?

“Maintenance didn’t update calibration logs.”
“We’ll remind them.”

That’s like saying Gotham is safe because you installed more streetlights.

Better RCA:

“No system alerts for calibration; siloed tracking between maintenance and quality.”
“Solution: Add auto-alerts + shared dashboard.”

Now that’s RCA and CAPA working side by side.

đź§  How to Actually Find a Root Cause (Not a Scapegoat)

Real RCA isn’t about pointing fingers — it’s about finding systemic causes. Here’s how:

1. The “5 Whys”
Keep asking “Why?” until you hit a systems issue.

  • Why was calibration missed? → No alert

  • Why no alert? → Manual tracking

  • Why manual? → No automation

  • Why no automation? → No budget
    âś… Root Cause: Lack of ownership + no improvement budget

2. Fishbone Diagram
Break the issue into categories — People, Process, Equipment, Environment, Materials, Management.
Visuals help uncover what’s really causing the error.

3. Evidence Echo
Your RCA must connect directly back to your evidence.
If there’s no echo between what happened and why, you’re guessing.

đź’ˇ Pro Tip: Systems Fail More Than People Do

The best auditors know this:

"People don’t cause problems. Systems allow problems to happen."

When RCA is focused on the process — not the person — your organization levels up. You shift from reacting to improving.

Clause 10.2 doesn’t demand blame. It demands better systems.

đź’» This Is Where QMSFlow Shines

In QMSFlow, RCA and CAPA don’t live in separate spreadsheets or Word docs.

They live on one screen, linked to the evidence and the original finding. Everything updates together.

  • No file version chaos

  • No tracking gaps

  • Just a clear story: Finding → Cause → Action → Proof

📌 See how RCA + CAPA work together in QMSFlow →

⚠️ RCA Traps to Avoid
  • The Blame Game: “Who messed up?” is the wrong question. Ask “What system let this happen?”

  • The Vague Villain: “Lack of training” doesn’t cut it. Be specific.

  • The Copy-Paste Cure: Last quarter’s RCA won’t fix this quarter’s issue.

🎯 Final Take: RCA Is How Your QMS Grows Up

When you do Root Cause Analysis right:

  • Findings don’t repeat

  • CAPAs close with confidence

  • Continuous improvement becomes reality

Because great quality systems don’t just spot issues — they make sure those issues don’t come back.a